|
|
Post by kobe on Mar 18, 2013 15:46:50 GMT -5
It's weird and unfair that people started to vote for the content of an article all of a sudden. You can't pick and choose when to actually vote fairly. |
|
|
|
Post by None on Mar 18, 2013 16:01:42 GMT -5
I clearly stated before that Jeff article should have been a "4". That Don article got three 3's and three 4's as well. I'm tired of kobe getting butt hurt because someone wants to vote a "4" If the article is a "4" im voting a "4" regardless. |
|
|
|
Post by None on Mar 18, 2013 16:03:03 GMT -5
u still haven't told me how this isn't a 5 im not posting why I said this is a 5 again...go search this thread or your voting thread. This article fucking sucks...its not a "5' article at all....If you have a problem with my voting. Please stop writing articles. |
|
|
|
Post by None on Mar 18, 2013 16:06:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Mar 18, 2013 17:51:01 GMT -5
bc u like aar  |
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Mar 18, 2013 17:51:25 GMT -5
this might reach 20  |
|
|
|
Post by norgeis on Mar 18, 2013 22:19:37 GMT -5
I clearly stated before that Jeff article should have been a "4". That Don article got three 3's and three 4's as well. I'm tired of kobe getting butt hurt because someone wants to vote a "4" If the article is a "4" im voting a "4" regardless. Cool so why did those articles get 75+% "5's" while this is struggling to get 50%. I don't see much of a difference in content. What's the explanation? People cannot pick and choose which article they want to judge fairly. It's ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Mar 30, 2013 10:11:16 GMT -5
|
|
