|
|
Post by Alex Len on May 18, 2013 18:20:02 GMT -5
- HC clock starting from the time when the transaction was (old rule being when a thread was posted)
- SG rule. Not sure what it would be, maybe cap it at a certain height, would go into effect ~3-5 seasons from now. Need opinions.
|
|
ilovebball
General Managers 
Detroit Pistons
Pistons!
Posts: 4,809
|
Post by ilovebball on May 18, 2013 18:25:48 GMT -5
Nah on height, is height really that much of an advantage?
Letter grade for rebounding, I'd understand.
|
|
aar
General Managers
New Orleans Hornets
Posts: 8,192
|
Post by aar on May 18, 2013 18:31:58 GMT -5
I also think there should be a time posted for draft/FA so that people are held accountable for not sending lists
|
|
nybombers3
General Managers
New York Knicks
Posts: 7,048
|
Post by nybombers3 on May 18, 2013 18:33:15 GMT -5
1st rule, yes
2nd rule, eh on height though I understand it's hard to really find something to limit besides maybe rebounding
|
|
ilovebball
General Managers
Detroit Pistons
Pistons!
Posts: 4,809
|
Post by ilovebball on May 18, 2013 18:35:42 GMT -5
I'm getting so sick of the HC. Its very annoying.
|
|
gmgreggor
General Managers
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 6,149
|
Post by gmgreggor on May 18, 2013 18:47:58 GMT -5
Maybe just start stipulating from this point forward who can and cant play SG among draftees.
|
|
gp
General Managers
Miami Heat
Posts: 3,985
|
Post by gp on May 18, 2013 18:57:16 GMT -5
yes on the 1st probably
no on the 2nd
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex Len on May 18, 2013 19:31:52 GMT -5
The draft position rule kinda takes care of the SG rule, but meh for players pre that rule: specifically Mirotic.
|
|
ashes
General Managers
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 3,423
|
Post by ashes on May 18, 2013 19:34:19 GMT -5
How about just apply the draft position rule across the board. Makes it much easier. People are always going to try to find ways to abuse SGs
|
|
ashes
General Managers
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 3,423
|
Post by ashes on May 18, 2013 19:34:30 GMT -5
With high rebounding*
|
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on May 18, 2013 19:36:54 GMT -5
Mirotic is avging 34/9.6 and 4 TOs.... Butler is avging 33/8.4 with 1 TO... which one is more unrealistic?
|
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on May 18, 2013 19:41:45 GMT -5
also, would it be a problem if Durant (avg 8.8 rebs) were starting at Sg?
|
|
ashes
General Managers
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 3,423
|
Post by ashes on May 18, 2013 19:43:55 GMT -5
Mirotic is avging 34/9 and 4 TOs.... Butler is avging 33/8 with 1 TO... which one is more unrealistic? Was Butler an intended PF? Am I missing something? Butler is as designed if I'm not mistaken. |
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on May 18, 2013 19:45:12 GMT -5
mirotic was always eligible to play on the wing... thats why i drafted him.
|
|
ashes
General Managers
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 3,423
|
Post by ashes on May 18, 2013 19:46:12 GMT -5
I'm quite sure broph did not intend for him to be a SG.
|
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on May 18, 2013 19:47:20 GMT -5
because every player created ends up being as the draft person intended? Mirotic is a wing... his ratings back that up.
|
|
ashes
General Managers
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 3,423
|
Post by ashes on May 18, 2013 19:47:36 GMT -5
Oh okay, move him to SG then
|
|
ashes
General Managers
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 3,423
|
Post by ashes on May 18, 2013 19:48:21 GMT -5
Nate Templeton's rating mean he is a wing too, he should play there too
|
|
ashes
General Managers
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 3,423
|
Post by ashes on May 18, 2013 19:48:56 GMT -5
Hey what a surprise the guy benefiting most has an issue with it being changed. Never seen that before
|
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on May 18, 2013 19:51:12 GMT -5
templetons notes said he wasnt eligible to start at certain positions... so yea, completely not relevant
|
|
