|
|
Post by Alex Len on Apr 15, 2013 2:11:57 GMT -5
Team Salary: $79,346,192
-$37,346,192
48 hours
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Apr 15, 2013 12:32:52 GMT -5
I went over with your signings though  And 70% of teams are at the HC, with 5-10 teams about to go over when they have to complete their roster. 78 mil hc is just no longer viable, but whatever. |
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Apr 15, 2013 12:33:38 GMT -5
ppl just continue to give huge contracts lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Apr 15, 2013 12:36:23 GMT -5
It doesn't really have much to do with it. Inflation is normal in leagues. That's why in every version we've had increases of the HC along the way. We're in what--2017--and the HC hasn't gone up yet? It's also so close to the soft cap that 78 is just too low. It makes it almost impossible to trade at these HC numbers. Almost every competitive team is at the HC.
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Apr 15, 2013 12:37:37 GMT -5
they all have a bunch of bad contracts
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Apr 15, 2013 12:43:00 GMT -5
Bos--77.2
Mia--77.4
NJ--77.4
PHI--76.6
NOH--75.3
CHI--76
CLE--77.2
DET--75.5
IND--77
MIL--77
TOR--77.7
That's just the East. Even middle of the road competing teams are at the HC, and it's not all bad contracts. The number is too low.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Apr 15, 2013 12:44:11 GMT -5
kobe, you are at the HC with a rookie contract PF, Faried at C who is criminally underpaid, and only 2 guys on max contracts.
|
|
aar
General Managers 
New Orleans Hornets
Posts: 8,192
|
Post by aar on Apr 15, 2013 12:44:27 GMT -5
I kind of agree
If HC is raised, it should be effective for next season and salary cap should be raised too
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Apr 15, 2013 12:57:43 GMT -5
kobe, you are at the HC with a rookie contract PF, Faried at C who is criminally underpaid, and only 2 guys on max contracts. ik its a part of strategy. im not going to be able to retain all of them obviously |
|
|
|
Post by kobe on Apr 15, 2013 12:58:01 GMT -5
meh i guess i dont really care either way but it gets shot down every time
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Apr 15, 2013 12:59:12 GMT -5
this is by far the most exagerrated the HC has ever been. In every other version it moves with time.
Never was below 82-85, especially this late into the 2000's
|
|
greeme
General Managers
New Jersey Nets
Posts: 14,094
|
Post by greeme on Apr 15, 2013 13:01:18 GMT -5
it only matters for a few years anyway
maxes go up with the hc
|
|
ashes
General Managers
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 3,423
|
Post by ashes on Apr 15, 2013 13:09:08 GMT -5
it only matters for a few years anyway maxes go up with the hc With the soft cap* Contract numbers are fixed in FBB, HC should realistically be able to be set anywhere with the only effect being we must adjust how we build teams and offer contracts. There is no inflation like real life, which is the only reason they raise salary caps. |
|
greeme
General Managers
New Jersey Nets
Posts: 14,094
|
Post by greeme on Apr 15, 2013 13:12:31 GMT -5
it only matters for a few years anyway maxes go up with the hc With the soft cap* Contract numbers are fixed in FBB, HC should realistically be able to be set anywhere with the only effect being we must adjust how we build teams and offer contracts. There is no inflation like real life, which is the only reason they raise salary caps. soft cap there is no inflation but since contracts are based on exp i think the contracts we have now - especially at the end of the contracrs - are probably more expensive that what we had a few yrs ago |
|
|
|
Post by Alex Len on Apr 15, 2013 13:32:43 GMT -5
Feel like we have this discussion every year
|
|
|
|
Post by None on Apr 15, 2013 13:37:08 GMT -5
keep the HC the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by None on Apr 15, 2013 13:37:12 GMT -5
keep the HC the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex Len on Apr 15, 2013 14:08:53 GMT -5
I'd put it up for a vote but the only way I'd do it is if it got 25 yes votes sooo ya
|
|
|
|
Post by ucrenegades on Apr 15, 2013 14:23:58 GMT -5
no it is because people give out redoncoulous contracts everyone laughed at my fa bids but i think i got some real nice contracts but people don't want to build teams and give a 3 or 4 year contract this is why i wish we could frontload or backload contracts like the nfl...........when a player is 33-35 he should not be getting 20 m a year. JMO of a newbie that prob doesn't count.
|
|
|
|
Post by None on Apr 15, 2013 14:24:55 GMT -5
I was all for changing the hard cap before but its actually fine. 78 mil forces teams to make moves and not sit on players. It also forces teams to consider the contracts when they sign players. Some guys are just pushing an agenda in this thread. Repeat HC offenders every single season.
|
|
