I've Got Something To Say - RANT #1

[alldaygb]

Feb 20, 2013 18:32:04 GMT -5 Nanzanator said:

names need to be in there

just look at how they respong... and how they vote. It's easy to see

[kobe]

[Alex Len]

Or maybe the biggest troll thing to do would be to not vote at all

[Nanzanator]

Yeah but i like to read and be like OH NO HE DIDN"T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OH SHIT MAMA THERE GOES THAT MAN!

etc

[Alex Len]

Lmao who voted 1? Erbes?

[Nanzanator]

i always vote 5

[kobe]

erbes penis

[alldaygb]

Feb 20, 2013 18:33:33 GMT -5 kobe said:

good because the only person mentioned was you, and if you took anything from that then good for you.

[Erbes]

You're right... your language can get pretty saucy. LOLOLOLOL

[alldaygb]

I'll take the post guys

[kobe]

lol where did u mention me ill read now

[Alex Len]

True I'm just here for the posts

[Nanzanator]

posts >>>>>

[alldaygb]

Feb 20, 2013 18:35:42 GMT -5 kobe said:

lol where did u mention me ill read now

Creativity in articles, it was only using an example

[kobe]

i like his little dance tbh

[gp]

5 for cursing

[jeff]

Well, let me be the first to say fuck you.

You completely missed the point of why I give 4's. So let me explain it to you again. I give 4's because I think a 5 should be a special article, something different from the usual BS and something that took quite a bit of time to do. Too be honest, if I was voting on how I actually feel I would give all of these articles 3s. It takes a hell of a lot longer to post 200 times than it does to spend the 20 minutes or so most of these articles appear to take. If you did a complete first round review with 3 or so sentences for each player, you'd get a 5. No doubt. I don't really give a single shit about originality of an article, but I do care about the time and effort you put into it. I'm not "spitting" on your effort. Is a +4 really that detrimental to your team? And lets face it, everyone votes 5 anyway. How about next time I just don't vote at all? Or that would also piss you off? So in essence you think that every article should just be given a 5 because you took the "time out of your day" to do it?

I'm busy as hell right now doing actual work- I don't want to spend my free time writing articles. Instead of being a tool, you should thank me for taking the time to read your articles and vote on them in a timely manner.

[ashes]

Snap

[gp]

Nice

[SPENCER]

Feb 20, 2013 19:46:58 GMT -5 jeff said:

Well, let me be the first to say fuck you.

You completely missed the point of why I give 4's. So let me explain it to you again. I give 4's because I think a 5 should be a special article, something different from the usual BS and something that took quite a bit of time to do. Too be honest, if I was voting on how I actually feel I would give all of these articles 3s. It takes a hell of a lot longer to post 200 times than it does to spend the 20 minutes or so most of these articles appear to take. If you did a complete first round review with 3 or so sentences for each player, you'd get a 5. No doubt. I don't really give a single shit about originality of an article, but I do care about the time and effort you put into it. I'm not "spitting" on your effort. Is a +4 really that detrimental to your team? And lets face it, everyone votes 5 anyway. How about next time I just don't vote at all? Or that would also piss you off? So in essence you think that every article should just be given a 5 because you took the "time out of your day" to do it?

I'm busy as hell right now doing actual work- I don't want to spend my free time writing articles. Instead of being a tool, you should thank me for taking the time to read your articles and vote on them in a timely manner.

Did u give him a 4?

Sent from my SPH-D710 using proboards